Elohist - definizione. Che cos'è Elohist
Diclib.com
Dizionario ChatGPT
Inserisci una parola o una frase in qualsiasi lingua 👆
Lingua:

Traduzione e analisi delle parole tramite l'intelligenza artificiale ChatGPT

In questa pagina puoi ottenere un'analisi dettagliata di una parola o frase, prodotta utilizzando la migliore tecnologia di intelligenza artificiale fino ad oggi:

  • come viene usata la parola
  • frequenza di utilizzo
  • è usato più spesso nel discorso orale o scritto
  • opzioni di traduzione delle parole
  • esempi di utilizzo (varie frasi con traduzione)
  • etimologia

Cosa (chi) è Elohist - definizione

ONE OF THE FOUR SOURCES OF THE TORAH IN THE DOCUMENTARY HYPOTHESIS
Elohist source; Elohist Source; E source
  • Kings]])}}

Elohist         
·noun The writer, or one of the writers, of the passages of the Old Testament, notably those of Elohim instead of Jehovah, as the name of the Supreme Being;
- distinguished from Jehovist.
Elohist         
According to the documentary hypothesis, the Elohist (or simply E) is one of four source documents underlying the Torah,McDermott, John J., Reading the Pentateuch: A Historical Introduction (Pauline Press, 2002) p.
Jahwist         
·add. ·- ·Alt. of Jehovist.

Wikipedia

Elohist

According to the documentary hypothesis, the Elohist (or simply E) is one of four source documents underlying the Torah, together with the Jahwist (or Yahwist), the Deuteronomist and the Priestly source. The Elohist is so named because of its pervasive use of the word Elohim to refer to the Israelite god.

The Elohist source is characterized by, among other things, an abstract view of God, using Horeb instead of Sinai for the mountain where Moses received the laws of Israel and the use of the phrase "fear of God". It habitually locates ancestral stories in the north, especially Ephraim, and the documentary hypothesis holds that it must have been composed in that region, possibly in the second half of the 9th century BCE.

Because of its highly fragmentary nature, most scholars now question the existence of the Elohist source as a coherent independent document. Instead, the E material is viewed as consisting of various fragments of earlier narratives that are incorporated into the Jahwist document.